Travis County, Texas — Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has filed a wrongful termination lawsuit on behalf of a hospice nurse who was fired after refusing to cover up patient abuse and reporting regulatory violations to state authorities. The case, filed in Travis County District Court, alleges that JOL Healthcare, Inc. and JOL Hospice LLC d/b/a JOL Hospice Leander violated multiple Texas whistleblower protections designed to safeguard both healthcare workers and vulnerable patients.
This lawsuit represents a critical fight for nursing professionals who risk their careers to protect patients from harm. When healthcare workers witness abuse, neglect, or dangerous practices, Texas law gives them both the right and the responsibility to speak up—without fear of losing their jobs.
JOL Healthcare and its hospice subsidiary market themselves as compassionate providers of end-of-life care for patients and their families. But according to the lawsuit, behind the company's public image lies a troubling pattern: discouraging staff from reporting abuse, directing employees to conceal misconduct, and punishing those who refuse to stay silent.
The events that led to this lawsuit began in February 2025, when a hospice patient under JOL's care fell during the night. Rather than receiving immediate medical attention, the elderly woman was forced by a family member to crawl across the house. Internal staff documented the incident, recognizing it as a clear case of elder abuse that required immediate reporting to Adult Protective Services (APS) under Texas law.
But when the time came to fulfill that legal obligation, JOL management allegedly told staff to "hold off" on reporting. They wanted the abuse kept quiet.
The nurse at the center of this lawsuit refused. She understood that Texas law doesn't give healthcare workers the option to ignore abuse—it mandates reporting. She immediately contacted state authorities about the abuse and the patient's subsequent death. She also filed reports with the Texas Board of Nursing detailing failures by JOL nurses and supervisors, including instances of patient neglect and improper medical care that put vulnerable hospice patients at risk.
These were not casual complaints. They were formal reports to regulatory agencies, the exact type of protected activity that Texas law was designed to encourage and defend.
Within weeks of making her reports, the nurse faced confrontation from JOL supervisors who questioned her about her communications with state regulators. The message was clear: speaking to authorities had made her a target.
On April 4, 2025, the nurse filed an additional report against JOL's Regional Director of Hospice Operations, documenting directives that caused patient neglect and violated basic nursing standards. Thirteen days later—on April 17, 2025—JOL terminated her employment.
The timing speaks volumes. Under Texas law, when an employee is fired within 60 days of making a protected report, the law presumes the termination was retaliatory. The burden shifts to the employer to prove they had legitimate, non-retaliatory reasons for the firing.
Healthcare workers in Texas enjoy some of the strongest whistleblower protections in the nation. The legislature has repeatedly made clear that patient safety depends on healthcare professionals being able to report problems without fear of career destruction. This lawsuit invokes several powerful legal protections:
This statute specifically protects nurses from retaliation when they report patient safety violations. The law covers reports made to:
The protection extends to nurses who report violations of laws, rules, or regulations that create a risk to patient welfare. Employers cannot fire, discipline, discriminate against, or otherwise retaliate against nurses who make these reports in good faith.
Texas recognizes a common-law protection known as the Sabine Pilot doctrine, which prohibits employers from firing employees who refuse to commit illegal acts. In Texas, failing to report elder abuse is a criminal offense. When JOL management allegedly directed staff to "hold off" on reporting the patient abuse, they were asking employees to violate the law.
A nurse who refuses such a directive—and reports the abuse as legally required—cannot be fired for that refusal. The Sabine Pilot doctrine treats such a termination as a violation of fundamental public policy.
This statute prohibits healthcare facilities from retaliating against employees who report violations of laws or regulations to supervisors or appropriate agencies. It creates a private cause of action for employees who suffer adverse employment actions after making protected reports.
The law recognizes that healthcare facilities have enormous power over their employees' livelihoods, and that vulnerable patients depend on staff members being willing to speak up when something goes wrong. Retaliation chills that speech and puts patients in danger.
Healthcare workers who have cause to believe that a resident of a facility has been abused, neglected, or exploited must immediately report that belief to the appropriate state or federal agency. This isn't optional—it's a legal mandate. Facilities cannot retaliate against employees for fulfilling this duty.
Patient abuse in healthcare settings is a serious and underreported problem. According to the Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, thousands of abuse and neglect reports are filed each year involving vulnerable adults in care facilities. But experts believe these numbers represent only a fraction of actual incidents—many cases go unreported because staff fear retaliation.
When healthcare facilities punish employees for reporting abuse, the consequences extend far beyond the individual worker. Other employees get the message: stay quiet or lose your job. Patients suffer. Families are kept in the dark. Regulators never learn about dangerous patterns. And facilities that engage in systemic neglect or abuse continue operating without accountability.
Texas lawmakers recognized these dynamics and built a legal framework specifically designed to protect whistleblowers. The statutes are clear, the remedies are meaningful, and the message is unambiguous: you cannot fire a healthcare worker for protecting patients.
The lawsuit seeks compensation for the full range of harms the nurse suffered as a result of her wrongful termination:
Economic Damages: Lost wages, benefits, and future earning capacity. Being fired for reporting abuse doesn't just cost a paycheck—it can damage professional reputations and make it harder to find new employment in the same field.
Mental Anguish and Emotional Distress: The lawsuit recognizes that being fired for doing the right thing causes significant psychological harm. Healthcare workers who report abuse often experience anxiety, depression, and stress related to both the termination itself and the trauma of witnessing patient harm.
Reputational Harm: When a nurse is terminated shortly after making reports to regulatory agencies, it can cast doubt on their professional judgment and credibility, even when the termination was unlawful.
Punitive Damages: Texas law allows juries to award punitive damages when an employer's conduct is especially egregious or malicious. These damages serve two purposes: punishing wrongdoers and deterring future retaliation.
Attorney's Fees and Costs: Texas whistleblower statutes allow prevailing employees to recover their legal fees, ensuring that workers can afford to hold powerful healthcare corporations accountable.
This lawsuit sends an important message to healthcare workers across Texas: the law is on your side when you report abuse, neglect, or regulatory violations. You have a legal duty to report, and your employer cannot punish you for fulfilling that duty.
If you work in healthcare and witness patient abuse, unsafe conditions, or violations of professional standards, you should:
Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has built a reputation fighting for workers whose employers violated their rights. While the firm is widely recognized for representing maritime workers under the Jones Act and railroad employees under FELA, the attorneys also have deep experience protecting whistleblowers and employees who face wrongful termination.
The firm operates on a contingency fee basis for these cases—No Win, No Fee. That means you don't pay attorney's fees unless the firm recovers compensation on your behalf. For healthcare workers who've lost their income due to wrongful termination, this removes the financial barrier to seeking justice.
With more than $500 million recovered for clients across various practice areas, Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has the resources, experience, and determination to take on powerful healthcare corporations that retaliate against employees for protecting patients.
Free, Confidential Case Evaluation
(713) 571-1146 (888) 571-1001No Win, No Fee | Over $500 Million Recovered
If you're a healthcare worker who has been fired, demoted, or otherwise punished for reporting patient abuse, safety violations, or regulatory violations, Doyle Dennis Avery LLP wants to hear from you. The firm offers free, confidential case evaluations to help you understand your rights and options.
The attorneys at Doyle Dennis Avery LLP—Michael P. Doyle, Patrick M. Dennis, and Jeff Avery—have dedicated their careers to protecting workers' rights. Whether you're a nurse who reported abuse, a railroad worker injured on the job, or a maritime employee seeking Jones Act damages, this firm has the experience and determination to fight for the compensation and justice you deserve.
Don't let fear of retaliation silence you. Texas law protects healthcare workers who speak up, and Doyle Dennis Avery LLP stands ready to enforce those protections.
Copyright © 2025 Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Trial Lawyers. All rights reserved. Powered By Blue Beam LLC
The information on this website is intended for general informational purposes only and is not legal advice for any individual case or situation. Viewing or receipt of content on this website does not create an attorney-client relationship between the user and Doyle Dennis Avery LLP.
The cases, verdicts and settlements displayed on this site are solely for illustrative purposes and should not be considered a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims or cases. Each case is unique, and past outcomes are not indicative of future results.
We recommend that users consult with an attorney for legal advice on any questions or concerns they may have. Users rely on the information on this website at their own risk.